Colorado Gov. Jared Polis signed several tax-related bills into law Tuesday, including two that deliver what officials are touting as historic cuts to taxes of different kinds.
One reduces income and sales taxes. Senate Bill 228 cuts the state’s income rate by up to 0.15% in years when state revenue handily exceeds the cap set by the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights, with a similar mechanism for the state’s sales tax rate. That equals an estimated $466 million this year — with the income tax rate reduced by the full amount, to 4.25% — plus an estimated $222 million reduction in sales taxes through a slight decrease in that rate, shaving off 0.13 points to make it 2.77%.
The second law, passed as Senate Bill 233, comparatively dwarfs the first. It makes adjustments that cut property taxes across the state and reduce what would be the total owed by taxpayers by an estimated $1.3 billion, according to bill sponsors.
Overall, state officials have estimated that law will save the typical owner of a $700,000 home roughly $400 a year compared to current law, though the exact amount depends on local mill levies.
But the tax cuts come with significant caveats.
The income and sales tax cuts draw on the same money — TABOR surpluses — that normally would be returned to taxpayers through refunds. And while the property tax cuts will reduce what property owners would otherwise owe, there’s no guarantee their bills won’t still rise as property values increase.
The property tax cuts also don’t represent an end to the tax wars that have dominated the ballot box and legislative sessions in recent years, as outside groups prepare competing, deeper reductionsto put to voters this November.
Still, the governor struck a celebratory tone.
“This is exciting,” said Polis, who has long advocated for reducing the income tax and pushed lawmakers to pass it among broader tax changes that included child tax credits. “With these historic savings, Coloradans and businesses will be able to hold onto more of their hard-earned money.”
“We needed a serious, statewide response”
Polis, lawmakers and advocates took thinly veiled shots at ballot initiatives 50 and 108 — two proposals backed by conservative advocacy group Advance Colorado and the business group Colorado Concern that would put tight leashes on property tax rates and collections.
The 2020 repeal of the Gallagher Amendment, which had kept residential property tax rates low at the expense of rising commercial rates, “left a void” in state tax policy right as the state went through a historic surge in home values, Polis said.
“There were some bad ideas out there” to replace it, Polis said. “There still are.”
Bill sponsors Sens. Chris Hansen and Barbara Kirkmeyer, a Denver Democrat and Brighton Republican, respectively, both noted the property tax measure specifically protects school funding. Just months ago, policymakers celebrated meeting constitutional school funding requirements for the first time in a decade.
The property tax law resulted from years of negotiations, buffered by temporary measures to blunt spikes in tax bills, to land on an “elusive” solution that didn’t hobble state and local budgets, particularly schools, Hansen said.
The law will decrease commercial property assessment rates from about 28% to 25% over the next several years.
It also takes 10% off residential property valuations, up to $70,000, while lowering the proportion of the property value used to determine taxes owed, known as the assessment rate. Schools, however, will still use a higher assessment rate to protect their funding.
The law also caps annual property tax increases for most local governments at 5.5%, though local voters can choose to override that cap.
“We needed a serious, statewide response that was a responsible alternative to the incredibly reckless ballot measures that were being proposed,” said Rep. Chris deGruy Kennedy, a Lakewood Democrat.
Critic: Property tax cuts are not “real relief”
The tax relief wasn’t enough to satisfy skeptics, though.
On Monday, Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce president and CEO J.J. Ament warned that the proposal “misses the mark” in actual tax relief.
And last week, the Common Sense Institute, a pro-business think tank based in Greenwood Village, released an analysis that warned homeowners would still end up paying higher tax rates compared to the temporary measures pushed through the legislature in recent years — and as property values increase.
Michael Fields, president of Advance Colorado, said his group has started to collect signatures for Initiative 108. That measure, if passed by voters in November, would dramatically lower the assessment rate and cost local governments an estimated $3 billion in lost property tax revenue, most of which would need to be replaced by tapping the state budget.
Its other measure, Initiative 50 — which has already qualified for the ballot — would cap increases in property tax collections at 4% year over year.
The new law signed by Polis “doesn’t provide homeowners real relief,” Fields said, so his group plans to give them an alternative. He said lawmakers and Polis failed to stabilize property taxes following Gallagher’s repeal.
But the ballot measures may not be a slam dunk.
Just ahead of the governor’s bill signing ceremony, opponents of the initiatives circulated a polling memo reporting that in a recent survey, neither cracked 40% support from voters based on the wording that would appear on the ballot. The online poll of 600 likely voters was conducted by Aspect Strategic between April 30 and May 2 on behalf of the Colorado Education Association; the results were weighted to reflect likely turnout in November and had a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.
Notably, the memo states, “voters are incredibly confused by these measures, a dynamic that has historically hindered ballot measure proponents.”
Stay up-to-date with Colorado Politics by signing up for our weekly newsletter, The Spot.
